Home » Daily Current Affairs » Kerala Assembly Passes Resolution Urging Central Government to Withdraw Waqf Amendment Bill 2024

Kerala Assembly Passes Resolution Urging Central Government to Withdraw Waqf Amendment Bill 2024

Kerala Assembly Passes Resolution Urging Central Government to Withdraw Waqf Amendment Bill 2024

The Kerala Assembly has unanimously passed a resolution asking the BJP-led central government to withdraw the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha in August and is currently under consideration by a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC). The resolution reflects concerns over the proposed changes, which lawmakers argue could undermine the autonomy of Waqf Boards and centralize the management of Waqf properties.

Key IssueKerala’s StanceBJP’s Stance
Waqf Board AutonomyOpposes central control, supports state managementSupports central nomination for transparency
Inclusion in Waqf BoardsKerala opposes central interferenceWelcomes inclusion of women and minorities
Land Disputes ResolutionConcerns over district collector authoritySupports district collector as final authority

Concerns Raised Over Waqf Amendment Bill 2024

Kerala’s Minister for Welfare of Minorities, Sports, Waqf, and Haj Pilgrimage, V Abdurahiman, moved the resolution under Rule 118 of the Assembly. He emphasized that Waqf is a subject on the concurrent list and expressed concerns that the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 would infringe upon state rights and challenge the principles of democratic federalism.

The primary concern of Kerala’s lawmakers is that the Bill allows for the nomination of Waqf Board members and the chairman by the central government, which they argue could weaken the autonomy of Waqf institutions. Additionally, there are fears that the changes could lead to the centralization of Waqf property management, reducing the role of state governments and local communities in managing these properties.

Opposition Parties Support the Resolution

Both the LDF (Left Democratic Front) and UDF (United Democratic Front) parties in Kerala expressed their support for the resolution. Congress MLA from Wayanad, T Siddique, argued that the Bill would strip states of their rights to manage Waqf properties, leading to excessive centralization of power.

With no BJP MLAs currently in Kerala’s legislature, the opposition to the Bill was unanimous. The assembly’s stance reflects Kerala’s broader resistance to centralization efforts, such as the “one nation, one election” proposal that the state has also opposed.

BJP Defends the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024

The BJP, however, defended the Bill. TP Sindhumol, BJP spokesperson in Kerala, welcomed provisions of the Bill, such as the inclusion of women and people from different communities in the Central Waqf Council. The BJP also supported the provision making the district collector the final authority in land disputes involving Waqf properties, particularly in cases like Munambam, where such disputes have led to public protests.

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju defended the Bill in Parliament, stating that the changes are aimed at bringing transparency to the management of Waqf properties and delivering justice to ordinary Muslims. He argued that some individuals had captured Waqf Boards for personal benefit, and the new Bill would address these issues without interfering with religious practices or mosque functions.

Concerns Over Centralized Control of Waqf Properties

Critics of the Bill fear that allowing the central government to nominate Waqf Board members will lead to the centralization of control over Waqf properties, which are community assets. Many argue that this centralization could lead to mismanagement and erode local control, which has traditionally ensured that Waqf properties serve their intended religious and community functions.

Kerala’s Opposition to Centralization

This latest resolution comes on the heels of Kerala’s recent opposition to the Centre’s “one nation, one election” proposal. The state has consistently voiced concerns about attempts by the central government to concentrate power, which they argue could harm the federal structure of the country.

Waqf Amendment Bill 2024- Summary:

  • Kerala Assembly passed a resolution urging the withdrawal of the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024.
  • The Bill proposes centralized control over Waqf Boards, including the nomination of members and chairpersons.
  • The state government argues this would infringe on state rights and democratic federalism.
  • The resolution was supported by both LDF and UDF parties in the Kerala Assembly.
  • The BJP defended the Bill, citing transparency and inclusiveness.

Kerala Assembly has also opposed the “one nation, one election” proposal earlier in 2024.

Also Read Latest Current Affairs 2024

US to Deploy THAAD Missile Defense SystemArjun Vajpai becomes the first Indian to climb Mt. Shishapangma
India to Host ISSF Junior World Cup 2025Harmanpreet Singh Becomes Most Expensive Player at Hockey India League Auction
5th National Water Awards 2023: Odisha Tops as Best StateRajkumar Hirani Receives National Kishore Kumar Award 2023
What is the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024?

The Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 proposes changes to the Waqf Act to introduce centralized control over the management of Waqf properties and the nomination of Waqf Board members by the central government.

Why is Kerala opposing the Waqf Bill?

Kerala argues that the Bill infringes on state rights and undermines the autonomy of Waqf Boards, violating democratic federalism.

What changes does the Waqf Bill propose?

The Bill proposes nominating members to Waqf Boards, including a nominated chairman, and makes the district collector the final authority in Waqf land disputes.

What is the BJP’s argument in favor of the Bill?

The BJP argues that the Bill brings transparency to the management of Waqf properties and ensures representation from all sections, including women and minorities.

Has Kerala opposed other central government proposals?

Yes, Kerala recently passed a resolution opposing the “one nation, one election” proposal, arguing that it undermines the federal structure of the country.

Scroll to Top