Home » Today Current Affairs » Aadhaar Card is Not Valid Proof for Age- Supreme Court

Aadhaar Card is Not Valid Proof for Age- Supreme Court

Aadhaar Card is Not Valid Proof for Age

Aadhaar Card is Not Valid Proof for Age- The Supreme Court has set aside a ruling by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which accepted the age on an Aadhaar Card as proof in a motor accident compensation case. Justices Sanjay Karol and Ujjal Bhuyan emphasized that the age of the deceased should be determined using the school leaving certificate, as per Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

The case involved an appeal by the family of a man who died in a road accident in 2015. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) initially awarded a compensation of ₹19.35 lakh, which was reduced to ₹9.22 lakh by the High Court based on the age stated on the deceased’s Aadhaar Card. The Supreme Court ruled that school certificates, not Aadhaar Cards, should be used for calculating the age in such cases.

Key InformationDetails
Initial Compensation₹19.35 lakh
Reduced Compensation₹9.22 lakh
Deceased’s Age (as per Aadhaar)47 years
Deceased’s Age (as per School Certificate)45 years
Legal ReferenceSection 94, Juvenile Justice Act
JudgesJustices Sanjay Karol & Ujjal Bhuyan
Aadhaar Card is Not Valid Proof for Age

Court’s Observation on Aadhaar Card as Age Proof

The bench highlighted that Aadhaar Cards, as stated in a 2023 circular by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), are valid for identity verification but not for determining date of birth. The Supreme Court upheld MACT’s decision, calculating the deceased’s age from the school certificate, which stated he was 45 years old, rather than 47 as per the Aadhaar Card.

Aadhaar Card is Not Valid Proof for Age- News Summary

  • The Supreme Court rejected the use of Aadhaar Cards as age proof in motor accident cases.
  • The decision came after the Punjab and Haryana High Court reduced compensation based on age determined by Aadhaar.
  • The family of the deceased appealed, citing the school leaving certificate which confirmed the deceased’s correct age.
  • The Court reaffirmed that the school leaving certificate holds statutory authority under Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice Act.
  • A 2023 circular from UIDAI states that Aadhaar is not a valid document for proving date of birth.

Also Read Latest Current Affairs 2024

India-China Border Agreement: Breakthrough After 4-Year StandoffAnguiculus dicaprioi – New Snake Species Named After Leonardo DiCaprio
New Zealand Women Win First ICC Women’s T20 World Cup TitleIndia’s Two-Child Policy Under Debate: Is Change Needed?
PM Modi Departs for Russia to Attend 16th BRICS Summit in KazanZimbabwe Sets Record for Highest T20I Total with 344 Against Gambia
Why did the Supreme Court reject the Aadhaar Card as proof of age?

The Court stated that Aadhaar is only valid for identity verification, not for determining date of birth, as per a UIDAI circular.

What legal document is considered valid for proving age in accident cases?

 A school leaving certificate is considered a valid document for age proof under Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

What was the High Court’s error in this case?

The High Court reduced compensation by calculating the deceased’s age using the Aadhaar Card, which was deemed incorrect by the Supreme Court.

How much compensation was initially awarded by MACT?

 MACT initially awarded ₹19.35 lakh as compensation.

What was the deceased’s actual age according to the Supreme Court?

 The Supreme Court determined the deceased’s age to be 45 years, based on the school certificate.

Is Aadhaar a valid document for determining the age in legal matters?

No, as per the Supreme Court ruling and UIDAI guidelines, Aadhaar cannot be used for verifying the date of birth.

Which act regulates the acceptance of age-related documents?

Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 regulates the use of age-related documents.

Scroll to Top